The guideline has been updated to include an improved inspection process and to align definitions and context with ICH E6 (R3). Due to downtime of the previous UPC platform, the ongoing consultation has been reuploaded and stakeholders have been renotified.
If you have already reviewed and provided comments during the previous consultation, please disregard this notification, as the same version has been reuploaded. The consultation will continue until the end of the designated consultation period.
Have Your Say
Showing 5 of 7 comments
NI
Nida Asnida Binti Baharin @ Md Daud
Duopharma UPC feedback.pdf
(43.05 KB)
HA
Hasniza Zaman Huri
KR
Krisna Veni Balakrishnan
AN
Anonymous
UPC NPRA - GCP INSPECTION Oct 2025.pdf
(67.71 KB)
AN
Anonymous
AN
Anonymous
NPRA GCP Inspection Guideline_Public Consultation_MSD_27Oct2025.pdf
(46.05 KB)
AN
Anonymous
Share your thoughts and feedback
Engage with stakeholders and provide administrative oversight on feedback.
Top 5 Comments
Most liked comments from this consultation
November 26, 2025
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please find attached the comments from Duopharma for your consideration.
Thank you.
November 8, 2025
1. Routine and For-Cause Inspection should be numbered
2. Flow chart 3.2- pre-inspection preparation - to rephrase to enhance clarity for e.g 'Submit pre-inspection documents?
3. Section 4.0- outcome of GCP inspection (favourable outcome and non-compliance) may need to be aligned with section 6.0. Critical, major and minor - how does it classified under favorable outcome or non-compliance
4. Pg 23 - Appendix A > clinical trials reviewed> should also include CTX
5. Pg 24-under the heading facilities and equipment -our inspection is not limited to this also protocol etc, perhaps the heading can be broader
6. Explanation in 'original' are great and should be considered to produce a comprehensive guidelines
7. Must have a clear statement 'inspection' conducted by regulatory authorities whereas 'audit' can be performed by others CRO, sponsors, study site etc
November 7, 2025
Dear NPRA,
1. The term CTIL/CTX is still in mentioned : line 740 and 741.
2. How about inspection towards Clinical Trial approved by MDA? As in safety of the patients uses the interventional medical devices but not in systemic or active compound?
3. inspected party (parties) like inspection can be at CRO , sponsor and site. or organizations . EMA uses personnel
4. Inspection report: Report prepared by the official representing the Competent Authority stating
whether the company inspected in general complies with the requirements of Directive (EU)
2017/1572, Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1569 and/or 91/412/EEC and whether the manufacturer
is acceptable for the products in question. The Union report format applies
5. CAPA reporting still has CTIL/CTX
6. How Clinical Trial Authorization (CTA) impacted in GCP onspection is that only based on the holders or site or CRO manages the trial.
November 5, 2025
Dear sir/madam,
Please find attached the comments from Hanan Regulatory Services.
Thank you
November 4, 2025
1. If there is evidence of serious breach of misconduct, will the investigator be blacklisted from conducting a trial?
2. It may be good to have the inspection checklist as an appendix.
3. How come there is no decision tree on whether DCA is going to terminate, suspend, or continue on the conduct of research?
4. Wll there be any clinical audit since it is a clinical matter? I mean there should be a doctor as part of the inspection team.
October 27, 2025
Please find attached the suggestions/feedback from MSD.
October 9, 2025
âĸ Outline guidance for conducting verbal and written consent in different languages (dual language consenting).
âĸ Specify how investigators should assess and document the patientâs understanding of both languages
No Surveys Available